Buscar
Estás en modo de exploración. debe iniciar sesión para usar MEMORY

   Inicia sesión para empezar

level: Level 1 of Social area

Questions and Answers List

level questions: Level 1 of Social area

QuestionAnswer
background for pillavinbystanders apathy - lack of concern, interest or enthusiasm to help diffusion of responsibility - people are less likely to help when others are present so the responsibility is shared Pluralistic ignorance - people can be misled by the bhv of others in an emergency situations
background for pillavinbystanders apathy - lack of concern, interest or enthusiasm to help diffusion of responsibility - people are less likely to help when others are present so the responsibility is shared Pluralistic ignorance - people can be misled by the bhv of others in an emergency situations
Milgram's participants40 males (20-50) New Haven
What type of sampling was Milgram's studyVolunteering thought the study was on memory
Aim of Milgram's studyWhat level of obedience would be shown with an authority figure
What is a summary of the procedure for M'sYale university - prestigous setting Participants met and drew would be the teacher/learner The learned strapped mr wallace to the shock generator and learner was told to read word pairs that mr wallace had to respond to. Wrong answer = shock. 15v to 450v at 300 he showed severe distress and learner was prodded to continue
results for M's65% to 450 v 100% to 300v displays of nervous laughter digging fingers into hand 3 had a seizure
Evaluation for miligramS- high control so increased validity and they geniunely believed so no demand characterisitcs both qual and quan W- deception
Behaviour is measured byobservational methods
Participants on PillavinTrain passengers racial composition 45% black and 55% white = 4450 men and women
The aim of the Pillavin studyinvestigate factors that affect people's action of helping
Procedure for pilVictim condition- sober/drunk /ill victim race- black or white Model position- critical area / adjacent area Model timing - 70 seconds or 150 seconds cr 70 cr 150 ad 70 ad 150
Background for MiligramNazi's following Hitler
results for pillavinmore male helpers( 90%) 65% HELPed were white women said it s for men to help him 95% helped
Pillavin Evaluationcost reward model eco valid large sample size - generalise debrief/deception
background for Pillavin (p=preston=train)kitty genovese - stabbed infront of a block of flats bystanders apathy , pilustic ignorance,diffusion of responsibility
Levine aimwhat affects helping
Levine methodquasi experiment iv was naturally occuring
Levine's participants1198 - 23 different countries -
Procedure for Levine1. dropped pen 2. hurt leg 3.blind person crossing the road particpinats had to pass a prederminded line to be recorded
community variables for levinepopulation size and pace of life
results FOR Lrio- brazils -1st Kuala lampur - malaysia -last
Levine evaluations- eco v w- reliability
Bochiaro b=blower whistle blower8 pilot studies in ansterdam
pptps bochiaro92 in 8 pilot and 149 in main university of Amsterdam
bochiaro vs miligrammore ethical shows an authority figure doesn't always have an affect on obedience
procedure bocsensory deprivation asked to write a letter to convince the reseach comittee left 3 mins alone to think 7 mins for the task wrote= obedient refused = diso reported =wb given two personality tests of HEXACO AND DECOMPOSED GAMES
results for boc9.4% wb BUT 37.3% EXPECTED 76.5% were obedient personality test shows no sig dif
background for pillavinbystanders apathy - lack of concern, interest or enthusiasm to help diffusion of responsibility - people are less likely to help when others are present so the responsibility is shared Pluralistic ignorance - people can be misled by the bhv of others in an emergency situations
What is the cost reward model in pillavinin emergencies bystanders are emotionally aroused arousal can be increased by empathy being close to the siutation , self blame or decreased by leaving the scene or danger you weigh up the rewards and costs of helping